Translating:Lib.reviews/Terms of use/io

Bonveno! Ca uzo-termini skribesis per simpla linguo, ne yurala, por facila kompreno da omni. Voluntez lektar ol atencoze! La skopo di ca termini esas faciligar vua uzo, e helpar ke vu komprenez nia filozofio e valori. Se vu judikos ke ca termini bezonas plubonigo, ne hezitez pri sugestar modifiki. Vu povas sendar informo che GitHub, o sugestar la modifikuro che che translatewiki.net, ube la pagino mantenesas e tradukesas.

Privateso

Ni mantenas enrejistruri (log) di la viziteri dum admaxime 90 dii. Li ordinare kontenas 1 lineo po singla demando (di pagino, imajo, API, edc). Singla lineo kontenas informi quale IP-adreso, URL, dati pri uzero (vua reto-navigilo, inkluzite versiono), refero-informo ed altra dati quin vua reto-navigilo sendas irgafoye vu vizitas ula reto-situo.

Ni povas kolektar altra log-i anonime, pri altra agado dil uzero (exemple: quanta personi kliktis en certena butono), por plubonigar la retosituo. Se ni facos to, ni mencionos ca agado publike, do altra personi anke povas lernar de ca informi.

We use standard methods (cookies, web storage) to store information in your browser, such as your user session key, your preferred user interface language, or drafts of information you've not published yet.

We may be required to respond to legal requests for user information (e.g., due to a subpoena). In those cases, we will notify you wherever reasonable, and will resist requests we consider to be invalid.

We do not monetize our users. We don't show you advertising or sell or share your private data with anyone (except when legally required to do so, as noted above), nor do we use any tracking or analytics services operated by third parties.

Reguli pri konduto e kontenajo

Ni kredas ke por esar bonavolanta e por ke bona laboro facesos, nia komunitato bezonas esar sana e mantenar kompromiso kun bazala principi partigita da omni. Kelk ek ca principi montresas en ca dokumento, kom politiki. Altra retsitui kelkafoye adoptas politiki nur kande uzeri reklamacas multe, e li permisas uzeri krear lia propra "filtrili" e segregaci, interaganta kun altri nur kande li savas ke li povas facar to. Ni ne kredas ke to kreos sana politiki por la komunitato, e ni esforcos pri aplikar efikive nia politiki.

Nia maxim importanta politiki pri konduto esas la sequanta:

Intruzo: Ni judikas intruzo serioze. To signifikas: nula personal atako kontre altri, nula bullying o minaco, nula nedezirata sexuala propozi, nula expozo pri personal informi o personala vivo di altra partoprenanti.

Odio-diskurso: Se vu odias negri, blanki, Aziani, individui kun pezo-eceso, magra individui, mulieri, viri, geyi, heterosexuali, individui qui esas o qui ne esas transsexui*, Judi, Mohamedani, Kristani, ateisti, o o irga grupo di sentiva homi, vu mustos mantenar to nur en vua privata vivo, o ni ne povos mantenor vu hike. Kritikar idei esas bona, e fakte ni suportas la kreo di grupi por diskutar temi, exemple "kontre atomala povo" o "favorebla ad atomala povo". Tamen ni nulatempe toleros l'uzo di ca platformo por dissemar odio-diskursi.

Libel: Since we allow reviews of absolutely anything, there will be situations where individuals may be motivated to post false information in order to discredit someone or something. Conversely, there will be situations where people will be motivated to claim that accurate information is libelous. This is difficult terrain, and we will generally try to resolve these things by supporting dialogue and building various trust/reputation features into the site. However, upon reviewing a specific case, moderators may take down a review if it is deemed likely to be false and defamatory.

Self-promotion and spamming: This isn't a place to promote something you've made yourself or are intimately involved with. We do encourage you to add metadata about your product/business/website/etc., as we add support for it to the site. It's also fine to review competitors' products and services, as long as you disclose any conflict of interest clearly in your review. And we ask you to respond to reviews which you think are inaccurate. Spamming constitutes abuse (see below) and will be dealt with accordingly.

Abuse: lib.reviews has a pretty clear and obvious site purpose, and if users systematically use it for another purpose or deliberately tamper with it, this is grounds for a ban and potentially escalation to legal authorities in severe cases.

Illegal content and behavior: You can't post any content that would be illegal to distribute under United States law, and we may be legally and morally obligated to report such uses to the authorities in certain cases. In the case of sexually explicit content, we will draw the line more strictly than the law does: any sexually explicit content involving minors is off-limits. Similarly, you're not permitted to perform actions on the site that are illegal under United States law.

Reviews of illegal content, products or services: Reviewing products or services that clearly target a specific jurisdiction where they're legal (e.g., a marijuana dispensary in a location that permits such sales) is completely fine. For online content that's illegal in the US (e.g., a warez site), or services that are illegal where they're advertised (e.g., "escort" services in most US states), you're not allowed to post reviews since they could be seen as wayfinders for breaking the law. At the same time, in legally ambiguous cases (e.g., a controversial website like Wikileaks), we will aim to err on the side of free speech.

Sexually explicit content, shocking content: We strive to serve people of all ages, which means that we want to identify content targeting adults clearly as such. So, if you feel sexually explicit content not otherwise forbidden in this document is appropriate in a given context, we'll ask you to flag it as such (or moderators may do it for you). We may also flag content that is graphic/shocking in other ways.

Humans are not products: We don't permit reviews of individual human beings (reviewing business entities operated by only one person is fine). So you can't write a review of your neighbor, or your teacher, or your boss. This is because we believe it's very difficult to protect people's dignity and reputation once you cross that line.

Trolling: We don't tolerate users who get joy out of making others miserable, wasting other people's time, or causing disruption for its own sake. Such users may attempt to follow the letter of the above policies, while violating their spirit. This paragraph is here to say clearly that in such cases, the moderators have discretion to ban users.

If you violate our rules, the site moderators (most likely volunteers like yourself) may temporarily or permanently ban you, or may temporarily suspend specific privileges. We will try to be consistent and fair, but we also give moderators a degree of discretion in enforcing these rules. Over time, we may reference some precedent decisions as appropriate (you may consider this a common law approach to policy).

Many sites include terms about data download and data mining as well, limiting download, scraping, and other data re-use. In contrast, the information published on lib.reviews is intended to be re-used! As long as you follow the license (see below), don't use data for purposes otherwise forbidden in this document, and don't make excessive use of our system resources, you're okay. :-)

Licencizo

The name "lib.reviews" references the gratis versus libre distinction. The work we do here is intended to be shared and built upon, and to be made available to the world indefinitely. As a consequence, whether explicitly stated in every context or not, by publishing information through this site you agree to do it under appropriate free licenses. We've settled on the following licenses:

* The text of reviews and posts (comments, blog posts, etc.) published through this platform is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License, the license used by Wikipedia. That means that if you want to re-use this content, you have to credit the authors by username next to their specific contributions. We recommend linking the name to their profile on this site, so the attribution is exact even in cases of pseudonyms or common names. (Beyond this, you're not required to mention lib.reviews itself, though it's nice if you do!) If you modify the content, your modifications/additions need to also be made available under this license, a principle known as copyleft. * As we add metadata to the things that are being reviewed (e.g., the hours during which a business is open), that data is available primarily under the CC-0 license (the license used by Wikidata; equivalent to the public domain — "do whatever you want with this data"). The exception is data imported from external sources under other free licenses that may require attribution and/or copyleft. In those cases, specific licensing requirements will be noted in both human-readable and machine-readable form. * The software (including static text pages like this one which are part of the software) is also under the CC-0 license, except for external open source libraries that may be under different licenses, which will be clearly indicated in the source code repository.

Users may include images and other media in their reviews and posts, and those images may not always be their own work. Given the noncommercial nature of this site, we consider many typical uses of such external web content fair use, but we will generally take down content if a copyright owner makes a plausible claim. If you intend to make commercial use of content on this site, you may need to apply additional scrutiny to ensure that fair use still applies.

Historio di redakturi

• Unesma versiono kreitaː1ma di agosto 2016: First version posted
• 4ma di agosto 2017: Minora redakturi kopiita, importacita de TranslateWiki